Connect with us

Sustainability

Climate Change Continues To Exacerbate Rising Sea Levels

Published

on

Ice caps are melting, causing a rapid increase in sea levels.

From the Himalayan Glaciers to Greenland’s terrain, climate change is melting ecosystems around the world. Over the last century, the Earth’s temperatures have been rising at an unnatural rate.

Unfortunately, this spike in warmth is causing a tremendous rise in sea levels. With icy lands from across the globe falling victims to climate change, a range of problems presents itself.

The Cyclical Nature of Climate Change

Increasing temperatures have caused frozen soils to thaw. As a result, permafrost melts, exposing the organic matter beneath its surface. This exposure is often the first time in thousands of years.

Creating a feeding ground, microorganism break down this organic matter, releasing a plethora of greenhouse gases. While these grounds hold almost 1,600 billion tons of carbon, the melting permafrost exists as a threat to the world’s atmosphere.

Permafrost melts and exposing the organic matter beneath its surface.
Permafrost melts and exposes the organic matter beneath its surface. Source: U.S. Geological Survey

With the potential to accelerate the global climate crisis, the constant emission of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide will only continue to raise temperatures through the greenhouse effect. As a result, the Earth is subject to what can be described as an endless cycle of permafrost melt.

Rising Sea Levels

Global sea levels are rising faster than previously predicted. By 2100, sea levels can rise by as much as 6.5 feet, according to some estimates. Consequently, nearly 200 million people will be displaced from their coastal homes and agricultural land will be damaged. Policymakers are working to provide solutions, but currently, there is simply not enough investment to fully combat the predicted threat.

In order to build sea walls for all coastal cities by 2040, investors will need to come up with $42 billion, according to the New York Times. However, this basic protection only accounts for cities over 25,000 residents. To expand the list to include communities that hold less than 25,000 residents will skyrocket the budget to over $400 billion.

With this data, both politicians and the public must face tough decisions. Smaller communities must depend on federal funding for future protection, unable to meet these startling costs on their own. However, every population is becoming vulnerable and at-risk to the threat of rising sea levels.

The Threat to National Security

For a long time, ice has been a natural border running along the waters of the high north. However, climate change is no friend to these frigid walls. As a result, the United States Navy is forced to keep a watchful eye near the Alaskan coast.

“You see the shrinking of the polar ice cap, the opening of sea lanes, more traffic through those areas,” Rear Admiral Daniel Dwyer said. “It’s the Navy’s responsibility to protect America through those approaches.”

Rear Admiral Daniel Dwyer expresses concern towards opening sea lanes.
Rear Admiral Daniel Dwyer expresses concern towards opening sea lanes.

While the Department of Defense does not view the Arctic as a large threat to National security, it is looking to expand military presence in these areas. Driving this push is the alarming increase of activity in the region from Russia and China, two nations that the Pentagon considers as rivals.

To respond to the changing waters, the United States deployed an aircraft carrier above the Arctic Circle in 2018. It was the first naval vessel to sail that far north in almost three decades.

Although panic levels are currently low for the United States military, the future plans for national security are becoming dependent on the polar ice caps receding.

Changes Needed To Slow Melting

From rising sea levels to threats in security, the tides are turning, both literally and metaphorically. Unequivocally, the change in physical landscapes is forcing communities to adapt.

What’s clear is that immediate action must be taken by nations across the world. While the scope of their current initiatives is difficult to gauge, nations, given that they work together, may be able to buy time for the development of more sustainable solutions.

Continue Reading
2 Comments

Sustainability

Miley Cyrus doesn’t want to have kids until the climate crisis is resolved. She’s not alone.

Published

on

As climate despair continues to grow, some have said they feel helpless; others have even said climate change has made them feel suicidal. Though Miley Cyrus isn’t on that level, she did recently said she doesn’t want to have kids until the climate crisis is resolved.

And she’s not alone. There’s actually an entire movement, BirthStrike, that shares the sentiment of not having kids due to the crisis. The movement is growing, and though Miley made no specific mention to it, she seems to embody at least some of its values.

Miley Cyrus Shares Her Thoughts with Elle Magazine

In a recent interview with Elle, Miley shared her thoughts on sustainability and climate change fairly extensively, saying:

“We’re getting handed a piece-of-shit planet, and I refuse to hand that down to my child. Until I feel like my kid would live on an Earth with fish in the water, I’m not bringing in another person to deal with that.”

We saw Miley’s angry rhetoric before: at one of her concerts, where she expressed her disdain for how human activity has damaged the environment. That speaks to her passion for the climate topic.

Later in the same Elle interview, Miley added:

“We just take and take and expect it to keep producing … it’s exhausted. It can’t produce.”

Though it’s unclear what she’s referring to specifically, her statement could be alluding to a number of things. For instance, she could be referring to the deforestation problem or how ocean pollution has affected marine habitats.

Miley Cyrus Isn’t Alone

Though most people’s decisions to have children aren’t affected by the climate crisis, Miley is far from being alone. BirthStrike is quickly gaining popularity, currently counting over 330 people as members of its organization.

To learn more about the organization, CNN spoke with 33-year-old British musician Blythe Pepino, who told the network:

33-year-old British musician Blythe Pepino is the founder of the BirthStrike movement.
33-year-old British musician Blythe Pepino is the founder of the BirthStrike movement. Image Credit: Linda Nylind/The Guardian

“I love my partner and I want a family with him but I don’t feel like this is a time that you can do that.”

The BirthStrike movement is grounded on two fundamental principles:

  1. Having kids would subject them to a deteriorating planet.
  2. Having kids would add to the emissions problem.

On an emotional level, the first point. And on a statistical level, since the typical person emits over 5 tons of carbon dioxide annually, one can understand the second point.

Miley echoes this sentiment, saying:

“I feel like that’s what all millennials are dealing with right now … We don’t want to reproduce because we know that the earth can’t handle it.”

But what really influenced her position on the climate crisis were the Californian wildfires, of which her family was a victim.

Wildfires Influence Miley’s Decision

The 2018 Woolsey fire caused over $6 billion in damages. Included in those damages was Miley’s $2.5 million Malibu home and some of her earliest songs. Miley took immediate action, and has accomplished a ton:

“After the Woolsey fire, I thought about how we helped more than 120 families who lost their homes. We’ve served nearly 1,300 homeless kids in Hollywood every year since 2014. And last year, we helped 270 kids find housing and provided 32,000 meals. That won’t burn down. That helped me become much more disconnected from things.”

The Woolsey fire burned Miley's $2.5 million Malibu home and some of her earliest songs.
The Woolsey fire burned Miley’s $2.5 million Malibu home and some of her earliest songs.

But despite a tremendous contribution from Miley, she can’t solve the wildfire problem alone (or at all, really). In part, that’s because the wildfire problem is everywhere. That’s where the helplessness comes from, as she shares:

“With natural disasters, you don’t get a choice. You surrender.”

To think from Miley’s perspective: “How can you expect your kids to do well if they can lose just about everything they have to a natural disaster?”

Conclusions

Regardless of whether you plan on having kids, a necessary consideration is whether the Earth can actually support them. Miley suggests that many millennials like her understand that it might be in everyone’s best interests to not bring up children in an age faced with the implications of climate change. That’s your decision to make.

Continue Reading

Sustainability

NYC makes history with new styrofoam ban

Published

on

Monday marked the first day New York City’s ban on styrofoam went into effect. From now on, the city will issue fines to businesses for selling single-use styrofoam products. 

The long-awaited ban formally started January 1, but the city granted businesses a six-month grace period prior to its enforcement. The new law prohibits products including takeout containers, cups, plates, and packing peanuts. Such a ban will most greatly impact the food industry, manufacturing companies, and retailers in the city.  

In lieu of styrofoam products, officials encouraged businesses to transition to compostable or recyclable alternatives, such as paper. However, there will be some exceptions, such as containers to store raw meat. 

Exceptions to the Styrofoam Ban

According to the New York Department of Sanitation (DSNY), small businesses with an income less than $500,000 can apply for an exemption. That is, if they can provide evidence that switching to foam substitutes will create too substantial a financial hardship, they will be exempt from the ban.

Ramifications for Businesses

Businesses caught selling or distributing styrofoam products will be fined $250 by the DSNY for their first violation, $500 for their second, and $1,000 for every one that follows. The department sent mailers to almost 130,000 businesses to warn them about the ban and provide help during the transition.

This law will make NYC the largest city in the U.S. to prohibit styrofoam. Other cities that have enacted laws banning the material include San Diego, Miami Beach, Seattle, and Washington DC. Maine and Maryland also have plans to implement legislation banning styrofoam in the coming years. 

“New York City’s ban on styrofoam is long overdue, and New Yorkers are ready to start using recyclable alternatives,” New York Mayor Bill de Blasio said upon announcing the ban last year. “There’s no reason to continue allowing this environmentally unfriendly substance to flood our streets, landfills, and waterways.” 

Reactions to the Styrofoam Ban

Many council members have praised de Blasio, a 2020 presidential candidate, for his commitment to making New York City more sustainable and environmentally-friendly. Earlier this year, the mayor announced a Green New Deal for the city with goals to make NYC carbon neutral by 2050, and also released a $10 billion infrastructure project aimed at protecting the city from rising sea levels spurred by climate change. 

Council members have praised Mayor de Blasio for his decision to ban styrofoam in NYC.
Council members have praised Mayor de Blasio for his decision to ban styrofoam in NYC.

de Blasio said in a statement that New Yorkers toss out 60 million pounds of styrofoam every year. He mentioned that this disposal leads to overflowing landfills and bolster the environmentally harmful petroleum economy. Further, the DSNY said styrofoam is harmful to the environment due to the difficulty associated with recycling it properly.

“We’re ending this dirty practice so we can ensure a cleaner, fairer future for our children,” de Blasio said. 

Conclusions

This ban acts as a major victory in the city’s fight against climate change. With a city as big as NYC taking such steps against reducing pollution, there’s hope others will as well.

Continue Reading

Sustainability

Guadalajara wakes up to 6 feet of hail…then it’s 83 degrees Fahrenheit again

Published

on

Just yesterday, Mexican officials said that a storm yielded some four feet of hail in the Guadalajara region. The hail storm reportedly damaged over 200 homes and swept away over a dozen cars. However, the temperature reached a high of 83 degrees Fahrenheit just later that day.

The State Government Helps Guadalajara

Guadalajara receives help from the state government.
Guadalajara receives help from the state government.

The state government acted quickly. Workers dragged businesses out of the hail. They also cleared streets and drainage systems.

Ramifications and Conclusions

Jalisco governor Enrique Alfaro was quick to correlate the hail storm with climate change. Translated from Spanish, Alfaro’s tweet can be understood as: “I was in the place to assess the situation and witnessed scenes I had never seen: hail more than a meter high, and then we wonder if climate change exists.”

Thus far, there are no reported fatalities or injuries as a result of the hailstorm. However, CBS reported that three adults may have developed hypothermia.

Strange Weather in Guadalajara

Granted that three adults may have developed hypothermia, it would be reasonable to believe that Guadalajara’s temperature was cold for at least the rest of the day. Weather reports showed that this was far from the case.

Within the same day of the hailstorm, Guadalajara reached a peak temperature of 83 degrees Fahrenheit.

In fact, at its highs, Guadalajara reached 83 degrees Fahrenheit.

But even preceding the hailstorm, Guadalajara saw temperatures around 88 degrees Fahrenheit. Further, current weather forecasts show that the city will see highs between 80 and 86 degrees Fahrenheit in the next 10 days.

Strange.

Continue Reading

Trending

Share via