Connect with us

Sustainability

Where Does This Year’s Earth Day Leave Us?

Published

on

earth

At a time where Elvis Presley and President Richard Nixon sat together in the Oval Office, US Senator Gaylord Nelson inspired the world. Engaging the public, Nelson would truly begin what would be one of the polarizing conversations of today: the environment.

In 1970, US Senator Gaylord Nelson implemented a national day of environmental education and activism. Forty-nine years later, Earth Day continues to be celebrated across the United States in its own modern take.

Climate Discussion Gets Heated

Nelson realized that change was necessary. For years, he fought for a platform to address the deterioration of our environment. In his own words, “the most important environmental issue is one that is rarely mentioned, and that is the lack of a conservation ethic in our culture”.  Leading a mission to combat this very issue, Nelson’s work was dedicated to progressing society out of environmental apathy. Despite his successes, today’s society is struggling to uphold Nelson’s hopes.

In an interview with his daughter, Tia Nelson, she exposes the sad reality of the country’s current status. “He certainly would be deeply distressed by the further erosion of bipartisan support for environmental protections… he would be sad and concerned about how partisan the issue has become”, she states. 

Thoughts From Activist Tia Nelson

Furthering the discussion, she says “he saw the right to drink clean water and breathe clean air as fundamental inalienable rights of every American, and rights that the government is obligated to protect in the same way that we expect the government to provide for our public safety and national security”.

The truth Tia Nelson brings to the light is nothing but eye-opening to the lifestyle of the world. Although US Senator Gaylord Nelson wished for a green and healthy lifestyle for every American, current trends illustrate heart-breaking realities.

The climate discussion has since turned into a climate debate, and additionally, a deeply partisan one too.

Whether through water pollution, soil erosion, or air pollution, it is evident there is a lot of room for improvement.

What Can You Do To Help?

Since the first Earth Day, the environment is deteriorating at a rapid rate. Unsurprisingly, the world still combating the same problems as half a century ago. However, each individual has the ability and responsibility to care for the environment. Here are some easy suggestions to go green:

  • Reduce Your Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    • The average vehicle emits 4.6 metric tons of carbon dioxide per year. While gas emissions contribute to the greenhouse effect, driving is causing the Earth’s temperature to rise. When possible, ditch the car and take a nice walk to your next destination.
  • Reuse and Recycle
    • Plastic waste can take up to 1000 years to decompose. With plastic pollution accumulating in Earth’s ecosystems, trillions of individual plastic particles float in water sources each year. To reduce emitted waste and pollution, swap out disposable plastic for reusable items.
  • Conserve Your Water Usage
    • With the current consumption rate, the world will be facing mass water shortages by 2025. To prevent stressing water systems or using excess energy, be conscious of your daily water usage. Time your showers, turn off your tap when not in use, and fix household leaks. Any form of conservation helps.

Conclusions

The decline of our environment has been a topic of conversation for far too long. For generations, man continues to destroy ecosystem after ecosystem. We all walk on the same soil and breathe the same air; We share the world we live in. For the sake of the future generations, it is up to each and every one of us to initiate change.

Together, let’s make each future Earth Day is greener than the last.

From everyone at The Rising, Happy Earth Day!

Continue Reading
4 Comments

Sustainability

Miley Cyrus doesn’t want to have kids until the climate crisis is resolved. She’s not alone.

Published

on

As climate despair continues to grow, some have said they feel helpless; others have even said climate change has made them feel suicidal. Though Miley Cyrus isn’t on that level, she did recently said she doesn’t want to have kids until the climate crisis is resolved.

And she’s not alone. There’s actually an entire movement, BirthStrike, that shares the sentiment of not having kids due to the crisis. The movement is growing, and though Miley made no specific mention to it, she seems to embody at least some of its values.

Miley Cyrus Shares Her Thoughts with Elle Magazine

In a recent interview with Elle, Miley shared her thoughts on sustainability and climate change fairly extensively, saying:

“We’re getting handed a piece-of-shit planet, and I refuse to hand that down to my child. Until I feel like my kid would live on an Earth with fish in the water, I’m not bringing in another person to deal with that.”

We saw Miley’s angry rhetoric before: at one of her concerts, where she expressed her disdain for how human activity has damaged the environment. That speaks to her passion for the climate topic.

Later in the same Elle interview, Miley added:

“We just take and take and expect it to keep producing … it’s exhausted. It can’t produce.”

Though it’s unclear what she’s referring to specifically, her statement could be alluding to a number of things. For instance, she could be referring to the deforestation problem or how ocean pollution has affected marine habitats.

Miley Cyrus Isn’t Alone

Though most people’s decisions to have children aren’t affected by the climate crisis, Miley is far from being alone. BirthStrike is quickly gaining popularity, currently counting over 330 people as members of its organization.

To learn more about the organization, CNN spoke with 33-year-old British musician Blythe Pepino, who told the network:

33-year-old British musician Blythe Pepino is the founder of the BirthStrike movement.
33-year-old British musician Blythe Pepino is the founder of the BirthStrike movement. Image Credit: Linda Nylind/The Guardian

“I love my partner and I want a family with him but I don’t feel like this is a time that you can do that.”

The BirthStrike movement is grounded on two fundamental principles:

  1. Having kids would subject them to a deteriorating planet.
  2. Having kids would add to the emissions problem.

On an emotional level, the first point. And on a statistical level, since the typical person emits over 5 tons of carbon dioxide annually, one can understand the second point.

Miley echoes this sentiment, saying:

“I feel like that’s what all millennials are dealing with right now … We don’t want to reproduce because we know that the earth can’t handle it.”

But what really influenced her position on the climate crisis were the Californian wildfires, of which her family was a victim.

Wildfires Influence Miley’s Decision

The 2018 Woolsey fire caused over $6 billion in damages. Included in those damages was Miley’s $2.5 million Malibu home and some of her earliest songs. Miley took immediate action, and has accomplished a ton:

“After the Woolsey fire, I thought about how we helped more than 120 families who lost their homes. We’ve served nearly 1,300 homeless kids in Hollywood every year since 2014. And last year, we helped 270 kids find housing and provided 32,000 meals. That won’t burn down. That helped me become much more disconnected from things.”

The Woolsey fire burned Miley's $2.5 million Malibu home and some of her earliest songs.
The Woolsey fire burned Miley’s $2.5 million Malibu home and some of her earliest songs.

But despite a tremendous contribution from Miley, she can’t solve the wildfire problem alone (or at all, really). In part, that’s because the wildfire problem is everywhere. That’s where the helplessness comes from, as she shares:

“With natural disasters, you don’t get a choice. You surrender.”

To think from Miley’s perspective: “How can you expect your kids to do well if they can lose just about everything they have to a natural disaster?”

Conclusions

Regardless of whether you plan on having kids, a necessary consideration is whether the Earth can actually support them. Miley suggests that many millennials like her understand that it might be in everyone’s best interests to not bring up children in an age faced with the implications of climate change. That’s your decision to make.

Continue Reading

Sustainability

NYC makes history with new styrofoam ban

Published

on

Monday marked the first day New York City’s ban on styrofoam went into effect. From now on, the city will issue fines to businesses for selling single-use styrofoam products. 

The long-awaited ban formally started January 1, but the city granted businesses a six-month grace period prior to its enforcement. The new law prohibits products including takeout containers, cups, plates, and packing peanuts. Such a ban will most greatly impact the food industry, manufacturing companies, and retailers in the city.  

In lieu of styrofoam products, officials encouraged businesses to transition to compostable or recyclable alternatives, such as paper. However, there will be some exceptions, such as containers to store raw meat. 

Exceptions to the Styrofoam Ban

According to the New York Department of Sanitation (DSNY), small businesses with an income less than $500,000 can apply for an exemption. That is, if they can provide evidence that switching to foam substitutes will create too substantial a financial hardship, they will be exempt from the ban.

Ramifications for Businesses

Businesses caught selling or distributing styrofoam products will be fined $250 by the DSNY for their first violation, $500 for their second, and $1,000 for every one that follows. The department sent mailers to almost 130,000 businesses to warn them about the ban and provide help during the transition.

This law will make NYC the largest city in the U.S. to prohibit styrofoam. Other cities that have enacted laws banning the material include San Diego, Miami Beach, Seattle, and Washington DC. Maine and Maryland also have plans to implement legislation banning styrofoam in the coming years. 

“New York City’s ban on styrofoam is long overdue, and New Yorkers are ready to start using recyclable alternatives,” New York Mayor Bill de Blasio said upon announcing the ban last year. “There’s no reason to continue allowing this environmentally unfriendly substance to flood our streets, landfills, and waterways.” 

Reactions to the Styrofoam Ban

Many council members have praised de Blasio, a 2020 presidential candidate, for his commitment to making New York City more sustainable and environmentally-friendly. Earlier this year, the mayor announced a Green New Deal for the city with goals to make NYC carbon neutral by 2050, and also released a $10 billion infrastructure project aimed at protecting the city from rising sea levels spurred by climate change. 

Council members have praised Mayor de Blasio for his decision to ban styrofoam in NYC.
Council members have praised Mayor de Blasio for his decision to ban styrofoam in NYC.

de Blasio said in a statement that New Yorkers toss out 60 million pounds of styrofoam every year. He mentioned that this disposal leads to overflowing landfills and bolster the environmentally harmful petroleum economy. Further, the DSNY said styrofoam is harmful to the environment due to the difficulty associated with recycling it properly.

“We’re ending this dirty practice so we can ensure a cleaner, fairer future for our children,” de Blasio said. 

Conclusions

This ban acts as a major victory in the city’s fight against climate change. With a city as big as NYC taking such steps against reducing pollution, there’s hope others will as well.

Continue Reading

Sustainability

Guadalajara wakes up to 6 feet of hail…then it’s 83 degrees Fahrenheit again

Published

on

Just yesterday, Mexican officials said that a storm yielded some four feet of hail in the Guadalajara region. The hail storm reportedly damaged over 200 homes and swept away over a dozen cars. However, the temperature reached a high of 83 degrees Fahrenheit just later that day.

The State Government Helps Guadalajara

Guadalajara receives help from the state government.
Guadalajara receives help from the state government.

The state government acted quickly. Workers dragged businesses out of the hail. They also cleared streets and drainage systems.

Ramifications and Conclusions

Jalisco governor Enrique Alfaro was quick to correlate the hail storm with climate change. Translated from Spanish, Alfaro’s tweet can be understood as: “I was in the place to assess the situation and witnessed scenes I had never seen: hail more than a meter high, and then we wonder if climate change exists.”

Thus far, there are no reported fatalities or injuries as a result of the hailstorm. However, CBS reported that three adults may have developed hypothermia.

Strange Weather in Guadalajara

Granted that three adults may have developed hypothermia, it would be reasonable to believe that Guadalajara’s temperature was cold for at least the rest of the day. Weather reports showed that this was far from the case.

Within the same day of the hailstorm, Guadalajara reached a peak temperature of 83 degrees Fahrenheit.

In fact, at its highs, Guadalajara reached 83 degrees Fahrenheit.

But even preceding the hailstorm, Guadalajara saw temperatures around 88 degrees Fahrenheit. Further, current weather forecasts show that the city will see highs between 80 and 86 degrees Fahrenheit in the next 10 days.

Strange.

Continue Reading

Trending

Share via